A responsible institution, an implementation plan and an answer when protection fails.
A recommendation or judgment needs a next step. We press for named responsibilities, implementation dates and a route to challenge inaction. We ask what has changed for the child, not only what document has been issued.
The Child Rights Code’s provisions on enforcement and reasoned decisions guide this work. Institutions should explain unresolved tasks as clearly as completed ones. [1]
Research & practiceChildren’s rights are not served by treating a mother’s word as inherently reliable or a father’s care as inherently less important. Decisions need evidence, not a hierarchy of parents.
Read the articleResearch & practiceThe challenge is not to import another slogan. It is to make reliable interviews, independent representation and continuous care available to the child who needs them.
Read the article
Case analysisAn administrative claim asks whether the State Care Agency’s actions and omissions harmed a child. The requested damages are symbolic. The questions about public power are not.
Read the article
Case analysisA doctor recommends further examinations. A hotline is contacted. An official reply follows. The missing question is whether the child receives the care.
Read the article
Case analysisRemoving an unlawful measure from the file is one task. Re-examining the arrangements, records and family relationships it affected is another.
Read the article
Case analysisA later report can change a child’s life. It should show the new evidence, address the earlier assessment and explain how competing information was tested.
Read the article
Case analysisA court authorises an observed meeting. The worker’s first responsibility is to understand that mandate and respond to what happens to the child—not improvise a different arrangement.
Read the article
Case analysisWhen a family dispute moves onto a screen, the child needs protection from exposure as well as an opportunity to be heard. Those are different tasks.
Read the articleCase analysisA concern about interpretation and professional support is useful only if it reaches the child’s casework. We examine the gap between a warning, a reply and a remedy.
Read the article
Case analysisWhen a lawyer asks investigators to examine possible influence on a child, the immediate protection question must not disappear inside the criminal file.
Read the article
Case analysisA judgment does not protect a child merely by existing. Responsibility continues through implementation and the child’s adjustment afterwards.
Read the articleShare your experience, join the volunteer team or offer pro bono professional help. We welcome contributions from Georgia and abroad.
